Streets serve vital economic and social functions. Only in the 20th
Century did the designers of streets place priority on the movement of
motor vehicles—often to the exclusion of economic and social purposes of
thoroughfares.
Engineers will tell you exactly how many cars and trucks are expected
to use a thoroughfare—but they rarely explore, with precision, the
economic development potential of a complete street. They can't tell you
how design will affect land values. They often don't keep track of how
many pedestrians or bicyclists use a street, let alone predict future
non-automotive travel.
To function well, traditional cities, towns, and neighborhoods must
be walkable, diverse, and mixed-use. Street design either hinders or
enables success. Too often it hinders, because complete
streets—thoroughfares that offer freedom in travel mode—are viewed as
exceptions, as "pilot projects." In cities and towns, streets for people
should be—in a real sense they are—the rule. They are the baseline, the minimum expectation.
Read the rest of the story here.
No comments:
Post a Comment